Skip to content

The Monotony of Perfection Part 1

10/04/2010

Steven Millhauser’s phrase, “the monotony of perfection,” has a lot to do with why heaven scares me. I’m referring to that local most coveted by the Judaeo-Christian community. You’ve seen some of the paintings, I’m sure. Plump figures frolicking about the clouds in cherubic abandon. Maybe an avuncular figure, seated on a throne, and looking an awful lot like Father Christmas. Sometimes it’s just the understated elegance of a lion and a lamb sharing a bite of grass together in a verdant pasture. These pictures of “heaven” are usually hanging behind the counter of your local Christian bookstore. But for me, it’s not the paintings; perfection’s the problem.

My main list of grievances against perfection:

1. It’s boring: I worry that heaven, as many have represented it to me, albeit with the best of intentions, is nothing more than a massive, and suffocating group-hug, a monolithic wall of good will and peace on earth. No deviations, no cracks, no frills, no dissonance. Just blissful perfection as untainted as the color white. No one says anything destructive, or hurtful, but no one says anything unusual either. In fact, we all sing, and speak in unison, with one voice, one will. No hearty conversations, or heated debates. Just a sea of heads nodding in agreement. Does this sound appealing? Haven’t we seen this kind of behavior in our history books? Maybe this is why Milton’s Satan is largely revered as a hero in most Universities.

2. It’s inescapable: This follows logically from my thoughts above, doesn’t it? Heaven, ensconced in perfection’s tyrannical envelope, is like a perfect circle. A closed system: nothing gets in, nothing gets out. No rugged charms, or five o’clock shadows here. No Byronic heroes. And once you’re in, you’re never getting out. It’s a prison where everyone gets along.

3. It’s exclusive: This should be obvious by now. Think of all the things you love that won’t make it through perfection’s gates… Only those who profess the same values as the masses convened within perfection’s perfect circle belong here. By the way, I hope you don’t like Family Guy. They’ll collect your leather jacket at the gate, if you don’t mind.
I could go on.

I confess, I’ve made a cult of imperfection because it’s the only way I’ve learned to better myself. My scars act as maps to places I couldn’t have escaped without the benefit of hurt. Another way of putting it would be, I just don’t get perfection because I’ve never known it in an experiential sense. I’ve never felt a pure motive or intention. I’ve never performed a completely selfless act. There’s always been that crack, that fissure, that assures me I’m still bound to this madly wheeling sphere we call earth. There’s always that thought, that fugitive curse, that convinces me I’ve hammered the nails into Christ just as much as anyone else.

In next week’s blog, I’ll tell you why I’m completely wrong about perfection, but you’ve got to admit that some of this has at least crossed your mind before.

16 Comments
  1. 10/04/2010 3:50 AM

    But, by definition, wouldn’t the kind of Heaven you’re describing be imperfect?

    No growth…

    No development….

    No change..

    Doesn’t sound very perfect to me.

    And I find it hard to believe that the Loving Father who created Earth in all it’s variety and cherishes every imperfect sparrow that falls would find such a sterile landscape terribly perfect either…

    My guess is this description of Heaven is not God’s, but rather belongs to someone on earth-someone who’s been through a lot of challenges, to whom never ending peace and predictability sounds like a real good time…

    Catherine
    Foresight

  2. 10/04/2010 12:54 PM

    Catherine,

    Doesn’t growth presuppose imperfection? At the very least, it seems to indicate a former state of ignorance, or a smaller stature which has been overcome.

    Change? Doesn’t the doctrine of God’s immutability preclude all change? In heaven, there would be no need for change since everything has reached the culmination of its potential.

    Try as I might, I can’t imagine a sparrow perishing, or flapping its broken wings once it’s crossed heaven’s gates.

    • 10/05/2010 5:12 AM

      Hi Cameron

      I believe that, since we are as God has made us, there is something He likes about us continueing to grow,learn and develop,even if there are mistakes in the process.

      I think of God as the perfect Father- and a good father wants His children to continue to grow.

      God is perfect- but that doesn’t mean that He doesn’t change. In the Bible, we see God chose to change when He promises that He will never bring the Great Flood again. We see Him change when He changes from the stern Father of the Old Testament to the more loving Father of the New Testament.

      God is perfect- but part of that perfection is growth and change….

      And even if that were not the case, God being perfect does not mean that we will be perfect in Heaven. That would make us the equilent of God…

      Don’t know about you. Even after learning and growing a lot, I don’t really think that I will be anywhere near perfect upon my passing.

      But God will love me anyway, in all of my inperfection.

      I don’t know if a sparrow will fall in Heaven. But I do believe that God loves us here as He will love us there

      Catherine
      Foresight

  3. dbaldwin86 permalink
    10/05/2010 3:03 AM

    Yeah, the heaven you describe sounds pretty hellish to me. Boring as…sitting in a church pew Sunday after life-sucking Sunday.

  4. 10/05/2010 11:23 AM

    Great responses!

    Bear in mind that this week’s blog is essentially a set-up for what I have to say next week, and doesn’t actually represent my personal views on heaven. That you’ll hear next Monday. (Though, as Dean above, and any of my friends will tell you, happiness and light isn’t always my strong point.)

    I do worry, however, that heaven occasionally comes across in these claustrophobic terms to nonbelievers. Our imaginations meet quite a challenge here, and I’m sure there are times when I’ve rendered paradise as little more than “a prison where everyone gets along” to hungry seekers.

    I’m with you, Dean. Some of these worries are genuine. I’ll confess I’ve never been fond of the passages in Revelation describing hosts of angels perpetually singing “Holy, holy, holy.”

    Just a few things, Catherine: another possible example of change in God would be his seeming regret at having created mankind in Genesis, though Genesis is a poetic book employing poetic devices and conventions, so there may be some nuances there. I wouldn’t draw a distinction between God in the Old and New Testament; the difference here is that Israel was formerly under the law, and then the new covenant ensured that all are under grace. Certainly, we have passages indicating God’s being persuaded as well. Abraham convinces Him to spare the lives of a few righteous men after all. What the doctrine of immutability really seeks to establish, I think, is that God’s perfect nature, or essence, is unchangable.

    These responses assure me that I’ve got a challenge ahead for next week’s essay. Keep the responses coming, friends!

    • 10/05/2010 1:04 PM

      Fair enough Cameron.

      I did get that you were planning a contrast in the following post. Thought I’d weigh in on the original matter presented, as I belive a lot of people see things like this.

      I do think, however, that the differences between how God handles things in the Old Testament and the New indicates that growth is a present part of even His perfection.

      And that makes me kinda happy….

      I am God’s child (as are we all…) I do not believe that I’ll ever be perfect. That’d make me like unto God, and I don’t think that’s in us.

      But I do think that I can set perfection as a goal to head towards and try my best to get as far in that direction as possible…

      Catherine
      Foresight

  5. 10/05/2010 9:25 PM

    I’m insufferable, I know, but I’ve got more questions:

    If the divine management in the New Testament reflects an improvement, or a change for the better from what we see in the Old Testament, how is that not a gentle condemnation of God’s pre-covenental leadership? The very suggestion of improvement implicitly means that things could have been handled better, or so it seems to me at any rate.

    I’m not sure I follow your thoughts on perfection. Christ says we are to be perfect as the Father is perfect. He also offers Himself as the ideal template for humaness. When we reach a state of perfection, I don’t believe that this impinges in any way on God’s power. After all, we’re still created, still derivative, and still contingent beings as Aquinas would have put it. Whether perfected or fallen, we’ll always owe our very being to God.

    • 10/06/2010 2:07 PM

      Hi Cameron

      I don’t necessarily see God changing being a condemnation of how He was before. I see it more as a question of growth in keeping with His situation.

      If there can be a “right man for the time”, I’d be thinking that’s possible for God too, no?

      We know from the Bible that God changes His mind. We know that he approaches man from one standpoint at one time, but changes His approach later on. If we work from the standpoint that God is perfect, then it follows that it is part of that perfection that God also learns, grows and changes…

      If you have a baby and you are a good parent, you approach that baby from one standpoint. Reason will not work with a baby, as he doesn’t have the tools to use it- you need to teach him to attend to his name and physically redirect him from harmful things.

      When that baby gets older, you change your approach. Now you can redirect that child verbally and reason with him- you no longer need to physicaly intervene.

      Each approach is perfect for where thast child is, and using the wrong approach for the age is ineffective and wrong.

      If a good human father knows this, would not the perfect heavenly Father?

      Maybe the perfection of God’s changing is that Man is growing up…

      Catherine
      Foresight

  6. 10/07/2010 7:21 PM

    “Maybe the perfection of God’s changing is that Man is growing up…” Nicely worded, Catherine.

    This quote seem to imply that, despite our long and often arduous journey, we emerge to find that it is not God who has changed, but we ourselves. Lewis would say it’s something that won’t come “till we have faces.”

    • 10/08/2010 6:15 AM

      Thanks Cameron. I appreciate the compliment, but I can see from your response that I could have done better with my wording.

      What I’m really trying to say is that part of God’s perfection is, that as Man grows up, God changes to continue to change in order to be the perfect Father Man needs at his new stage of development…

      Just like an earthly father. Only better :-)

      The fact that God changes does not make His previous position imperfect. It was perfect for then. But a new type of perfection is needed now.

      Catherine
      Foresight

  7. 10/09/2010 3:49 PM

    Then I’ll take respectful exception to your remarks, Catherine, though I assure you, you’ve articulated yourself remarkably well, deftly and politely maneuvering around my efforts to goad you into agreement with my position.

    Philosophically, I think of God as the “unmoved mover.” Spiritually, I see Him as the “rock of ages.” I think we change and grow indefinitely, and I also think that God “meets us where we are,” so to speak, modifying His interactions with us according to the level of our maturity, to borrow from the parent/child metaphor you proffered earlier. But I think our own movement (read change, growth etc.) misleads us into thinking that God is moving with us, changing with us, when in fact, it is only we who have changed, and He who has made the necessary concessions. Christ walked with us for a season, but now He sits at the right hand of the Father where He has resided since time immemorial.

    I look forward to your thoughts on Monday’s post!

  8. 10/12/2010 2:33 PM

    Cameron

    If all we had to look to was the story of Noah, the fact that God says He will never send the floods again tells us that He is capable of growth and change.

    And if, as you say, that we have changed and “God has made the necessary concessions”, those concessions are change in our Heavenly Father as well.

    I believe that He is perfect…

    I believe that He is constant…

    I believe that He is unyielding in His Love for us…

    But I do not believe that He is static and unmoving…

    I’ve seen too much of His Love to believe that

    Catherine
    Foresight

    PS Christ came to earth in part to be one of us and therefore understand us better. Which would imply learning and growth as well…

  9. 10/14/2010 6:02 PM

    Well said as usual, Catherine.

    “If all we had to look to was the story of Noah, the fact that God says He will never send the floods again tells us that He is capable of growth and change.”

    This is not necessarily an indication of change. God’s choice to flood the earth once for all time could just as easily have been a unified decision known by Him before creation. The only thing separating the flood from God’s resolution is chronology, which does not in and of itself, imply a change in the decision.

    “PS Christ came to earth in part to be one of us and therefore understand us better. Which would imply learning and growth as well…”

    A compelling statement, though I would put more emphasis on Christ’s redemptive purpose in stepping into creation. The intricacies concerning Christ’s simultaneous humanity and divinity become so intricate that I lack both the courage and the theological insight to venture too far into the territory. Suffice it to say, I think Jesus was fully human, but I also think that He confronted sin in just as intimate and empathetic a manner when he watched the creatures He’d lovingly fashioned from the dust and breathed life into, choose death over life, a fallen world over paradise.

    Genesis employs many poetic conventions and Hebrew poetry is known to have drawn on anthropomorphisms in order to more vividly convey the intensity of a particular human emotion. Thus we have passages that inform us of God’s “regret” at having created humanity. Change forms the only landscape we’ve ever known. To divest our minds of it is impossible. Hebrew poets understood that the only possible way to bridge this chasm was through the use of analogy, which functions much like a bridge in linking two distant things together. We undergo a world of change before we meet our earthly demise. The name we have given to this dynamic process of refinement in the Christian’s walk is sanctification. Biblically, the change we most need, and the change we must cultivate a deep and ernest desire for is to be more like Christ. To be Christ-minded. To do this, we must reach a destination which is itself unmoving, but waits for us, like a home with an unlocked door and welcoming arms.

  10. 10/15/2010 1:37 PM

    And what if the Father’s ability to change is part of the Plan?…

    Catherine
    Foresight

  11. 10/15/2010 2:31 PM

    If it’s part of the plan, how is it change?

  12. 10/18/2010 1:33 AM

    Because all good plans include the need for change…

    Because situations change, children grow, and enthropy (another part of the plan) happens…

    Because any plan that doesn’t adapt to meet the change intrinsic in God’s Universe quickly becomes outmoded and no longer effective…

    God’s plan, to be truly divine, must change to meet the changing world He has created…

    Catherine
    Foresight

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.